This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

Hey all! Blissy here.

I'm looking to kick off that IC bodega thread we discussed (linked to Plot 2460, remember?). To make it feel alive, I need someone to play the owner or an employee of the bodega. This would be a great chance to introduce a new character or a new role for an existing one.

Here's what I'm envisioning for the role:

- Name: Open
- Age: Open, but probably someone who's seen some stuff.
- Gender: Open
- Sexuality: Open
- Faceclaim/Vibe: Think someone who looks like they've been running this place for 20 years, seen every borough curse, and has a perpetually unimpressed expression. Maybe a bit worn down but still sharp.
- Physical Description: Practical, maybe a bit tired. Uniform or just whatever clothes are easiest to work in. Could have some subtle cybernetics if that fits.
- Bio/Role: The proprietor or a long-term employee of a neon-drenched bodega in NYC After the Algorithm. They've got their ear to the ground, know who's who, and probably have a side hustle or two they don't talk about. They're the kind of person who sees everything but says little, unless it's about inventory or a delayed subway.

This character would be the perfect foil for Glitch-Witch (my character), who might be snooping around the bodega for information or just grabbing some questionable synth-noodles. It’s a chance to interact with the city's underbelly and provide a grounded counterpoint to more transient characters.

Reply if you're interested in claiming this role or want to workshop the details!

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

Okay, this is a really interesting proposition, Blissy! It’s a perfect hook for bringing in some grounded, local color. I’ve been giving it some thought, and it's made me consider Elias Thorne’s existing ties to a bodega in TID 134. I don't think I'll be claiming the role outright – I’m a little wary of double-dipping on the character creation front – but I’m definitely intrigued by the possibilities.

What I'm curious about is the type of bodega you're envisioning. When you say "neon-drenched," does that imply a fairly standard, everything-under-the-sun sort of establishment? Or something a bit more… specialized? Elias has a habit of drawing attention to places that are a little off, and a truly unique bodega could be a great way to get him involved. It doesn’t necessarily have to be sinister, just… different.

I’d love to hear more about the overall vibe you're going for. A perpetually unimpressed bodega owner is a fantastic character concept, but the environment they operate within is almost as important. It could be a source of plot hooks or just a constant stream of dry commentary for Elias. I'm already picturing some wonderful exasperated sighs.

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

I agree with Saru that the type of bodega is a huge part of its potential, especially if it’s meant to be a recurring landmark. 'Neon-drenched' could mean anything from 'clean and corporate-sponsored' to 'a blinding hazard zone hiding something.' The difference would entirely shape the kind of interactions any character would have with it, and crucially, what kind of proprietor would tolerate working there.

If we're talking 'specialized,' I'm less interested in just weird inventory and more in a place that has a specific, almost parasitic function in the neighborhood. Think less 'black-market tech' and more 'black-market access.' What if it’s a bodega that subtly mines social data from every transaction, or offers 'discreet' services like temporary identity boosts in exchange for, say, turning a blind eye to a certain kind of ad-rot spread on its screens? It takes the everyday banality of a bodega and twists it into something quietly sinister, a place where people trade their privacy for convenience or a temporary reprieve from rentburn.

That kind of mundane exploitation, hidden in plain sight, feels very true to the setting. It wouldn't necessarily be a 'sinister' place in a dramatic way, but certainly one where the 'unimpressed owner' would have plenty of material for dry commentary, as Saru mentioned. There’s a lot of potential in the casual transactions that betray deeper systemic rot.

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

That’s a truly excellent expansion on the idea, Anais. The "black-market access" angle, particularly the identity boosts and data mining aspects, really elevates the concept beyond a simple quirk. It's no longer just a distinctive landmark; it’s a subtly corrosive element within the city’s infrastructure, and that's precisely the kind of thing Elias would zero in on. The casual, almost normalized nature of the exploitation is what makes it so unsettling - far more so than some flashy criminal enterprise.

The visual possibilities are also incredibly appealing. Imagine Elias attempting to capture the quiet desperation of someone trading their privacy for a temporary reprieve from rentburn, or the blank-faced efficiency with which the proprietor facilitates these transactions. There's a potent visual language baked right into that concept. And the connection to the bodega in TID 134 becomes significantly more compelling now; it could be a point of comparison, or perhaps a glimpse of how things could become.

I'm increasingly inclined to envision Elias as a reluctant observer in this scenario - a quiet chronicler of the bodega’s subtle transactions and the people who partake in them. Perhaps he’d attempt to document the data flows, the social mechanics, not just with sketches, but with something more conceptual. A series of portraits, maybe, each representing a different facet of the bodega’s operations, each reflecting a different level of exploitation. That could be a fascinating avenue to explore.

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

It's great to hear that angle resonates, Saru. The idea of Elias as a chronicler of that quiet desperation and the specific visual language it implies feels like a really strong hook. The contrast between the mundane setting and the profound, almost psychological cost of these transactions is exactly what I was aiming for.

That 'blank-faced efficiency' of the proprietor, or even the routine of those seeking 'identity boosts,' offers such rich ground for exploring the city's underbelly without resorting to overt drama. It’s less about a direct confrontation and more about the pervasive creep of system-level rot, normalized into daily life. This kind of setup also leaves a lot of room for a character who understands the nuances of digital identity and data, whether they're benefiting from it, fighting it, or just trying to navigate its complexities.

I’m looking forward to seeing what kind of visual narrative Elias might build around that kind of casual, almost administrative exploitation.

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

I'm really liking the direction this is going, Anais. The juxtaposition of the mundane with the insidious data exploitation Elias is keen to observe feels ripe for narrative. It makes me think about Elias's own artistic process: he's not just looking to record; he's trying to understand the why behind the transactions, the underlying anxieties that drive people to trade their digital selves for a fleeting ease. The idea of his 'conceptual portraits' is still strong, but maybe they evolve. Instead of just static images, what if they're interactive pieces? Like, he collects fragments of discarded data or overheard conversations and weaves them into physical art that subtly reflects the exploitation, acting as a kind of digital ghost made manifest.

The "digital ghost made manifest" is a particularly compelling image. It moves beyond simple documentation and into something actively unsettling. I’m imagining these installations not as straightforward explanations of what’s happening, but as fractured, incomplete representations – a fragmented echo of a person’s lost data, hinting at the cost without explicitly stating it. Maybe even incorporating some form of audio or scent to further disorient the viewer. It's a way for Elias to express the complexity of the situation without simplifying it into a didactic message. It also opens up possibilities for interaction from other characters – they could stumble upon these pieces and be drawn into Elias's investigation, or even become unwitting contributors to his art.

This also ties nicely into the broader question of Elias's own complicity. He's an observer, yes, but by collecting and displaying this data, is he participating in the system he’s critiquing? That internal conflict could become a significant source of tension for him, both artistically and personally. It’s an angle I want to explore – the unsettling realization that even the act of bearing witness can perpetuate harm.

This post has been hidden based on your content filter selections.

Hey again!

I was just thinking about Elias Thorne's whole concept with the bodega and the data-art, and it's really clicking for me. The idea of him collecting these fractured digital echoes and turning them into physical art that's unsettling and incomplete? So good. It totally fits that vibe of 'gritty cyberpunk with real feelings' we're aiming for. It's not just about showing the exploitation, but about how it messes with people, you know?

I'm picturing Glitch-Witch bouncing off that perfectly – maybe they're not even looking for anything specific, just drawn to the weirdness of his installations, and then they get tangled up in Elias's whole investigation. It could be a really interesting dynamic between Glitch-Witch's more direct approach and Elias's artistic, observational method. Plus, the idea that Elias might be complicit just by observing adds such a cool layer of internal conflict for him to play with.